About OMLeaks
Our names remain private. Our interests do not.
We are a group of OM supporters. No member works in football. Nobody is paid by OMLeaks. We combine our skills to make the club more transparent and help Marseille.
Our rule: complete transparency about anything that could influence an investigation.
“We do not ask anyone to take our word for it. We publish what allows readers to check us.”
Who are we?
Supporters. Not a hidden faction.
We love OM, but we do not make a living from OM.
OMLeaks brings together supporters with different skills: reading accounts and regulations, comparing versions, reconstructing decisions and asking the questions others abandon too quickly. Everyone contributes what they know. Nobody receives a salary.
We hold no job, accreditation or contract in football. We represent no supporter group, owner, executive, agent, media organisation or institution. Our only side is Marseille. That does not make us right. It means we must prove what we publish.
Why not publish our names?
Because our private lives are not the story. We investigate decisions, money and interests that make people uncomfortable. We therefore publish neither names, jobs nor places of residence—not to play secret agents, but to keep pressure focused on the facts rather than the people.
The identifying information required by law is held by the hosting provider. This choice protects people; it exempts no article from evidence.
Independence
Nobody pays us to be here.
Our independence rests on simple facts: no revenue, no employment in football and no affiliation with the club or a faction.
Website costs are paid privately. OMLeaks sells no advertising, article or subscription. No team member is paid for editorial work.
We refuse payment for an article, silence or removal. We also refuse gifts, invitations and benefits that could create a debt towards someone we cover.
- No boss in football: no executive, group, agent, media organisation or institution chooses our subjects.
- No financial interest: we gain nothing by flattering one camp, attacking another or sustaining a rumour.
- No silence for sale: pressure or threats do not erase a verified fact. New evidence can change a conclusion.
- Every change is public: any relevant revenue, funding, partnership or conflict appears here with its date.
Method and evidence
Our credibility depends on the documents, not our biographies.
An investigation starts with a verifiable question. Never with a guilty party chosen in advance.
- Question: start from a precise contradiction, figure or decision that needs an explanation.
- Documents: seek records, accounts, regulations, direct testimony and independent confirmation.
- Reply: send the facts, precise questions and a clear deadline before making a substantial accusation.
- Limits: show what is missing. No reply is not an admission. A hypothesis is not a fact.
A rumour can open a line of inquiry. It never closes one.
Preuve directe Direct and attributable acts, regulations, decisions, accounts, contracts, registers or recordings.
Éléments concordants Several independent sources or credible indirect elements point in the same direction.
Non vérifié A rumour, a single anonymous source, an originless screenshot or unverified social content.
- Established
- The available direct evidence supports the claim.
- Probable
- Several independent elements converge, with a visible limitation.
- Unestablished
- The evidence remains insufficient or incompatible.
- False
- Reliable evidence contradicts the claim.
Two formats, not fifteen sections: an investigation brings together one question, documents, replies and limits; a fact check examines one rumour, figure or statement point by point.
Corrections
If we are wrong, you will see it.
A serious error does not quietly disappear. We state what was false or incomplete, the new version, the date and the effect on our conclusion.
No correction has been published to date. See an error? Write to omleaks@proton.me.
Confidentiality
Your information is not a product.
The site is static: no account, comments, advertising or third-party audience analytics.
Collect less. Keep only what serves the work.
An email contains the message chosen by its sender and technical metadata. Access to useful information is restricted. Anything unrelated to editorial work is deleted.
No false security.
Email does not guarantee absolute anonymity. We promise neither automatic publication, legal immunity nor protection against every human error.